Review Article
Sustaining Innovative Organizational Changes: Post Pandemic Era
- Evaristus Chino Ezema 1*
- Ogochukwu Agazie 2
- Gideon Onyebuchi Idoko 3
- Samuel Alao 4
- Nnenna Bessie Emejure 5
- Omotola Emmanuel 6
- Cheikh S. Galledou 7
- Amarachi N. Abanobi 8
- Joy Ugwuanyi 9
- Ifeatu Ogochukwu Oranusi 10
- Sorrentina Awala 11
- Sybille Defeugaing 12
- Kelechi Adannaya Iwuji 13
- Gyullu Nifatlieva 14
- Vivian Obitulata-Ugwu 15
- Ivy Oyairo 16
- Ndukaku Ogbonna 17
- Chidalu Ibeneme 18
1Department of Graduate Studies, Virginia University of Lynchburg, VA, United States.
2Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
3Fanshawe College, Ontario, Canada.
4Department of clinical services, PY Medical Group, Flushing, NY, United States.
5Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Imo State University, Orlu, Nigeria.
6Department of Administration, Emory Regional Hospitals, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
7Department of Medicine, St. Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine, Dakar, Senegal.
8Department of Health Science, North Arizona University, Arizona, United States.
9Dept of Internal Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria.
10Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Nigeria.
11Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospital, NC, United States.
12Department of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, St. Maarten.
13Department of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
14Department of Medicine, Donetsk National Medical University, Ukraine.
15Department of Public Health, Texila-American University, Gyana.
16Department of Medicine, Trinity School of Medicine, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
17Department of Transplant Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska, United States.
18Department of public health, University of Toledo, Ohio, United States.
*Corresponding Author: Evaristus Chino Ezema, Department of Graduate Studies, Virginia University of Lynchburg, VA, United States.
Citation: Evaristus C. Ezema, Agazie O., Gideon O. Idoko, Alao S., Nnenna B. Emejure, et al. (2025). Sustaining Innovative Organizational Changes: Post Pandemic Era, Journal of BioMed Research and Reports, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 8(4):1-4. DOI: 10.59657/2837-4681.brs.25.194
Copyright: © 2025 Evaristus Chino Ezema, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: August 12, 2025 | Accepted: August 26, 2025 | Published: September 02, 2025
Abstract
Background: The Covid-19 pandemic introduced changes in our various lives. Hospitals witnessed changes in their usual daily routines. The hospital procedures, finance, patient care, training, and staff performances were affected. In addition to the sad consequences, were the death of some hospital staff. This review examines the core organizational changes implemented in hospital system in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Methods: Using the search terms “organizational changes and Covid-19 pandemic,” “innovations in hospitals and Covid-19 pandemic,” Creativity in hospitals during Covid-19 pandemic,” in PubMed, Google scholar, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine and CORE, we conducted a review on organizational and hospital changes during Covid-19 pandemic.
Results: Key findings were a sudden response to the complexity of the Covid-19 pandemic, a robust communication network, teamwork, and collaboration, plus resilience in the face of lethal challenges to achieve success in handling the pandemic.
Conclusion: Hospitals around the world must remain futuristic in sustaining these key innovations.
Keywords: changes; innovative; organizational; pandemic; sustaining
Introduction
Change is the instance of making or becoming different from the original stance [1]. When referring to an organization, it means the undertakings in which an organization changes the fundamental component of its structure, like its culture, the environment or its operational infrastructures. It is better defined as a process by which an organization adjusts its structure, strategies, procedures, or culture in response to internal or external changes [2]. It includes a variety of changes meant to improve performance, efficacy, and flexibility. These adjustments may be brought about by the need to address issues, adapt to changes in the market, or seize fresh chances. The unfortunate reality of the past COVID-19 era was how it has impacted organizations. It introduced a strong plan of action for change in numerous unexpected aspects of organizations. Employees struggled to deal with the rate of change occurring in their organization. Companies had to carry out their daily routines differently. Most staff started to work from homes as the whole processes changed to keep pace with the new reality and stay afloat. Notably, there were changes to personnel, organizational goals, service offerings, and operations shortly following the pandemic. The changes did not follow the classical types of organizational changes. Instead, there were elements of transformational and corrective changes. It was transformational by introducing advanced technology and training the employees to adjust to the emerging new realities. The introduction of technology gave rise to a consolidated transition, which was abrupt. It incorporated the remedial component, which was reactionary because the pandemic was sudden, and an immediate solution was paramount. The reactionary change might not have been ideal, but its benefits were undeniable. These strategic, people-centric, structural, and remedial changes were nascent innovations in face of pandemic crisis. Therefore, as an employee of an organization, whether in a leadership role or rank and file, we should be ready at all times to embrace organizational change [3].
Methods
This is a narrative review. We conducted the search of literature using the search terms “organizational changes and Covid-19 pandemic,” “innovations in hospitals and Covid-19 pandemic,” creativity in hospitals during Covid-19 pandemic,” in PubMed, Google scholar, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine and CORE. The reference lists of articles were reviewed for organizational and hospital changes during Covid-19 pandemic.
Literature Review
There have been many publications about organizational changes in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic and the implementations of such changes. However, in a study entitled rethinking organizational change in the COVID-19 era [4], the researchers acknowledged that planned organizational change follows a well-thought-out arrangement. Such a model of planned organizational change though applicable during the COVID-19 crisis, was not adequate in the challenging moment of the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, the researchers offered a relatively new model from the complexity theory for organizations, called Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS). It showed promise for addressing the unique crisis facing hospitals in the COVID-19 era. The CAS framework comprises constant assessment, ongoing high levels of communication, iterative cycles of experimentation, reflection, and learning.
In the research paper entitled leading change in response to COVID-19, the researchers, stated that it is essential to put employees, customers, and members of local and extended communities at the heart of change programs and change the manners we confront the pandemic, requiring cooperation [5]. They contended that organizations that flourished, maximized on their ability to use their social capital to create partnerships with government, communities, suppliers, customers, and competitors. To this end, they made a people-centered collaborative change requiring transparency of decision-making and information sharing. As a result, there was a willingness to share visionary thinking and extra-ordinary ways of doing things and adopting new ideas.
Navigating changes in the era of COVID-19, the researcher studied the role of top leaders’ charismatic rhetoric and employees’ organizational identification [6]. The study evaluated how organizations can leverage leadership and employee resources to facilitate positive change outcomes. Based on the self-concept-based motivational theory of charismatic leadership and substitutes for leadership theory, the index study proposed a theoretical model connecting top leaders’ charismatic rhetoric, employees’ affective commitment to change, and turnover intention. The study also investigated contingencies that may modify the relationship between leadership communication and followers’ outcomes. Results from an online panel of 417 U.S [6] employees showed that top leaders’ use of charismatic rhetoric during changes led to followers’ affective commitment to changes, which decreased their turnover intention.
De-Lucas-Ancillo and colleagues propounded a grounded theory approach in their study on workplace change within the Covid-19 context.7 They investigated the status at the Covid-19 era and future evolution of the workplace within the Covid-19 pandemic context. Analysis was done using documents, publications, and surveys from numerous sources, to learn more about the employees’ and organizations’ experience with remote working and the advantages and disadvantages of accessing the workplace during the pandemic. The study was able to identify patterns in the literature regarding what has happened and its influence on the workplace. The revolution initiated by the Covid-19 era has changed the way companies and employees work by a reinvention of how they operate and causing actions never seen before, generating profound changes in the workplace. Therefore, the idea of the workplace has changed from the pre-covid era to the Covid-19 period, where reinvention of work, technology, and safety are critical points in its transformation process.
It is clear from the literature above that the Covid-19 pandemic era caused changes in overall organizational businesses, from the repertoire of daily tasks to the futuristic plan.
Organizational Changes and Its Sustenance
The Covid-19 pandemic brought a crisis, killing thousands, and orphaning many children in the aftermath. All aspect of our lives were affected. Sadly, organizations share their challenges of the pandemic. The healthcare facilities serving many communities fall under these organizations. Unfortunately, hospitals were one of the worst-hit organizations by the pandemic. The statistics of fatal cases created enormous anxiety among the staff [8]. The death of some staff changed a lot about initial opinion of the disease. The real task was the necessity for a real-time revamp of care models for the deserving patients. Covid-19 is highly contagious; with the severity of the infection, physicians, nurses, and other clinicians discovered the appropriate care model and room redesign. Another challenge was protecting the physical and mental health of frontline staff, while there have been anecdotal reports of frontline staff dying by suicide [9]. Hospitals and clinics had to ensure an adequate supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) for their teams.
The hospital management around the world called for urgent management meetings. These meetings were turning points in the subsequent management changes in health organizations. Firstly, the meeting resulted in sustenance of emergency committee that have continued to serve almost all the hospitals around the world till this day. The committee comprises members of all the departments of the hospital tasked with the coordinated immediate response in times of emergency. Routine meetings of this team have been helpful in guiding the executives on areas of focus for optimal running of the hospital and emergency preparedness. The team continues to identify gaps in hospitals and strengthening of core surveillance capacities. Through their efforts there is extended support to resources and logistics, thereby mitigating emergency risks. The second task was creating a collaborative, open, and inclusive virtual work environment to manage the situation.10 Telehealth has continued to be in application post-Covid-19 era. Its application has widened to cover both audio and audio-visual encounters of patient follow up. Technologies and tools that support remote work environments, such as virtual private network infrastructure, access control mechanisms, and data security, became a priority and have remained top on the priority list.11 For instance, medical conferences are currently being held through virtual media. This practice gained prominence following the Covid-19 pandemic.
The adapted policies on controlling emergency disease outbreaks have remained in place post-Covid-19 pandemic era. These policies were adapted to suit local practices around the world. In addition, there continues to be regular advocacies for the hospitals to innovate their operating model by leveraging new and digital ways of working. Hence, most hospitals currently embraced a digitized operating model globally. Another rallying point is the identification of stakeholders. These include staff, suppliers, patients, donors, board of commissioners, government agencies, and the media. Partnering with stakeholders is vital for any organization, given that the top priority is to work in synergy during emergencies. It is a practice that has continued to optimize organization productivity.
Implementations
Preventions
The policy on prevention is still operational with less strictness. Any visitor arriving at healthcare facilities gets interviewed about symptoms, travel history and possible contact with any sick individual. A distance of six feet between people is still being encouraged but wearing mask is currently optional. The practice of employees washing their hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds after touching places of public contact has remained a routine. If soap and water are not available, an alcohol-based hand sanitizer is used. The policy on vaccination continues to be implemented around the world.
Contingency capacity strategies to mitigate staffing shortages
The adjustments in staff schedules, adding to staff numerical strength, rotating staff to positions that support patient care activities, and removing non-essential services and procedures from the lists of operations are still in practice in some hospitals till this day [12]. Most hospitals took a bold step by shifting many employees to remote work, including clinicians working with telehealth technologies. Telehealth technologies are currently being utilized now more than ever before for virtual health consults around the world. These practices have become an integral part of the operational modalities of organizations around the world.
Leadership Changes
A response team birthed from the Covid-19 pandemic within the hospital community is still operational in many hospitals. It comprised division chiefs, nurses, anesthesiologists, and perioperative staff representatives. They are also responding to attending to emergencies. In addition, most of their meetings are through video conferencing.
Conclusion
Delivering healthcare services faced numerous serious obstacles as a result of the Covid-19 epidemic. Hospitals faced critical shortages in human resources, equipment, and spaces, necessitating rapid restruck-tureing of care deliver models. Innovations in communication, teamwork, and creativity were key components of the healthcare facilities’ immediate response leading to successful reactions to the de-vastating pandemic. Hospitals around the world have become futuristic in sustaining these approaches.
Recommendations
Organizations around the world must strive to sustain the current practices brought up by the Covid-19 pandemic. Hospitals aiming for sustained advancement must build on the gains of the Covid-19 pandemic management creativity. The current telehealth and telemedicine being practiced in most hospitals should be expanded to many hospitals around the world. These modalities of consultation should be freely offered as alternatives to patients.
Finally, effective communication, teamwork, good leadership, emergency preparedness, and knowledgeable staff brought about by the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic should be sustained across the board to drive organizations to futuristic realities.
Declarations
Acknowledgements: None.
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. All authors declare that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors consent to this manuscript’s publication.
References
- Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Breaking the code of change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 29:226–242.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Phillips, J., & Klein, J. D. (2023). Change Management: From Theory to Practice. TechTrends: for leaders in education & training, 67(1):189–197.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Brimm L. (2015). How to Embrace Complex Change. Harvard Business Review. 112:108–110
Publisher | Google Scholor - Choflet A., Packard T., Stashower K. (2021). Rethinking organizational change in the COVID-19 era. J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 5:16
Publisher | Google Scholor - Amis J.M., Janz B.D. (2020). Leading Change in Response to COVID-19. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 56(3):272–278.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yue G.A . (2021). Navigating change in the era of COVID-19: The role of top leaders’ charismatic rhetoric and employees’ organizational identification. Public Relations Review, 47:102118
Publisher | Google Scholor - De-Lucas-Ancillo A., Del-Val-Nunez M.T., Gavrila S.G. (2021). Workplace change within the COVID-19 context: a grounded theory approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34:1:2297-2316.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Raoofi S, Pashazadeh Kan F, Rafiei S, et al. (2021). Anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in hospital staff: systematic review plus meta-analysis BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Fischer-Sanchez D. (2020). Mental Health Care during the Covid-19 Pandemic. WillisTowersWatson Insight.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S. et al. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nat Hum Behav, 6:43–54.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Schmidtner M., Doering C., Timinger H. (2021). Agile Working During COVID-19 Pandemic, in IEEE Engineering Management Review. 49(2):18-32.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Errida A., Lotfi B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management.
Publisher | Google Scholor
