Research Article
Quality of Life of Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Associated Factors at Public Hospitals of Central Ethiopia, a Multicenter Study
- Mangistu Abera Merdasa *
- Mesfin Difer Tetema
- Ayele Sahile Abdo
- Menberu Tefera
- Aberash Beyene Derribow
Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.
*Corresponding Author: Mangistu Abera Merdasa, Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.
Citation: Merdasa M A, Tetema M D, Abdo A S, Tefera M, Derribow A B. (2025). Quality of Life of Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Associated Factors at Public Hospitals of Central Ethiopia, a Multicenter Study. Journal of Women Health Care and Gynecology, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 5(2):1-9. DOI: 10.59657/2993-0871.brs.25.078
Copyright: © 2025 Mangistu Abera Merdasa, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: December 20, 2024 | Accepted: January 06, 2025 | Published: January 22, 2025
Abstract
physical, social, and sexual activities and causing psychological suffering. People frequently mentioned symptoms like pelvic discomfort, urine incontinence, and sexual dysfunction, which negatively affected their overall quality of life. There are few studies on the quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia. This study aimed to find out the quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse and its associated factors at public Hospitals, in Central Ethiopia, in 2024.
Methods: Women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse at public Hospitals were the subjects of an institutional-based cross-sectional study conducted from January to March 2024. The data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a validated Prolapse Quality of Life assessment tool. The data collected was entered into Epi-data version 4.6, and analyzed with the statistical package for social science version 26. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were calculated. Statistical significance was determined using a p-value of less than 0.05.
Result: The study included 401 women who had prolapsed pelvic organs, yielding a response rate of 97.1%. The overall poor quality of life was 48.4%. Regarding the quality-of-life domains; General Health Condition 331(82.7%), was highly affected, and role limitation 117 (28.2%) was the least affected domain. Stage III/IV Prolapse (AOR=14.5, 95% CI 8.05, 26.08), women with decubitus ulcer (AOR=4.1 95% CI 1.38, 12.15), and parity >7(AOR=3.1 95% CI 1.59, 6.01), were significantly associated with poor quality of life.
Conclusion: Approximately half of women with pelvic organ Prolapse reported poor quality of life. Women with stage III/IV Prolapse, decubitus ulcers, and parity of more than seven have a statistically significant impact on their quality of life.
Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse; quality of life; Ethiopia
Introduction
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of female pelvic organs into or via the vagina, which includes the bladder, uterus, small intestine, and rectum [1]. This is most usually caused by a pelvic floor support deficit, which can be caused by a variety of risk factors such as vaginal delivery, advancing age, and growing body mass index; atrophic alterations induced by aging or estrogen loss, continuous straining, and connective tissue abnormalities [2, 3]. The affected women may present with the clinical presentation of urinary or fecal loss or retention, vaginal pressure or heaviness, abdominal, low back, vaginal, or perennial pain or discomfort, a mass sensation, difficulty walking, lifting, sitting, and stress or fear related to anxiety about the problem, which leads to hysterectomy and accounts for 15-18% of procedures in all age groups [1-4]. Pelvic organ prolapse affects millions of women, affecting 19.7% of women in developing countries and 23.52% in Ethiopia [5-7]. Common causes include old age, heavy lifting, high parity, home delivery history, chronic constipation, and cough. It limits physical, social, and sexual activities, causes psychological discomfort, and increases healthcare costs [8-10]. Furthermore, access to health treatment to manage these disorders is frequently limited, and women are typically forced to live with the effects for the rest of their lives [11]. The quality of life for women with POP differs by country, according to economic status, lifestyle, education level, and culture [12]. However, a study found that the most common risk factor for decreasing QoL in women with POP is pelvic organ prolapse symptoms [13-14]. Overall, pelvic floor disorders negatively impact women's lives, emotions, and quality of life, and they may be connected with some systemic symptoms such as urine, bowel, and sexual problems, which can considerably impair women's quality of life[15-16]. Pelvic organ prolapse has a significantly higher impact on women's quality of life in underdeveloped nations than in industrialized countries [17-18].The burden of pelvic floor dysfunction in developing countries is poorly understood, and its impact on women's health and quality of life is not recognized as a public health problem due to limited studies [19-20].
The P-QoL tool is used in developed nations to assess the quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but it is ineffective in developing countries, particularly Africa, due to a lack of information. The majority of research focuses on the prevalence, diagnosis, and management of chronic illnesses, with little attention paid to their effects on quality of life[ 21, 22]. Pelvic organ prolapse is a severe health issue that leads to social withdrawal, stigma, and negative impacts on women's socioeconomic and reproductive activities [23, 24]. It can cause embarrassment, social isolation, and diminished self-esteem, affecting their overall well-being and quality of life [25, 26]. Women with POP may have limitations in physical activities, discomfort during ordinary tasks, and disruptions in employment duties, resulting in a lower quality of life and an increased economic burden [27]. To summarize, understanding the complex effects of pelvic organ prolapse on women's quality of life requires a multifaceted approach that takes into account physical, emotional, social, and functional factors [27, 28]. However, in Ethiopia, the quality of life study of people who have had POP is not well understood and no research has been conducted in the study area particularly [28]. As a result, assessing the quality of life and associated factors among those who had POP has practical implications for healthcare providers, program planners, and policymakers to use as baseline data to focus on the basic factors and develop a feasible intervention plan to improve women's quality of life.
Materials and Methods
Study area and Study period
A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted at public hospitals in Central Ethiopia. There are seven public hospitals in central Ethiopia and they provide services for populations of Gurage, Hadiya, Silte, Halaba, Yem, and other neighboring zones. The study was conducted from January to March 2024.
Study design and population
All women who have been visiting public hospitals in Central Ethiopia during the study period and diagnosed with POP were the source population. All women with pelvic organ prolapse who were visiting selected public hospitals of Central Ethiopia during the study period were the study population. All women diagnosed solely with pelvic organ prolapse at selected hospitals in Central Ethiopia during the study period were included in the study.
Sample size and Sampling procedure
A single population proportion formula, using the assumptions of 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error, was used to estimate the sample size. The proportion of poor quality of life women with POP of 57.5% was used to calculate the sample size [25].With a 10% contingency for a non-response rate, the final sample size was 413. Then, the sample was proportionally allocated for the seven selected hospitals based on their monthly patient flow, and study participants were selected using a systematic sampling technique.
Study variables
Dependent variables
Quality of life women with POP
Independent Variables
Socio-economic and demographic characteristics: age, religion, residency, marital status, educational level, occupation, monthly income, transportation,
Quality of life with POP-related factors: Duration of Prolapse, Parity, Stage of Prolapse, Decubitus ulcer, menstrual status.
Quality of life of POP: General health condition, POP on the overall of life, role limitation physical limitation, social limitation, personal relationship, emotion, sleep/energy,intensity or severity of pain.
Data collection method and measurement
An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. It includes socio-demography, and Prolapse quality of life questions with different domains (P-QoL) [25]. Poor quality of life was declared whenwomen scored greater or equal to the median score of the overall QoL domains [29, 30].
Operational definition
Quality of Life (QoL)
The World Health Organization defines quality of life as an individual's perception of their overall well-being concerning their culture, values, goals, and concerns. It encompasses physical, mental, emotional, social, and functional aspects of life [31].
Poor quality of life
Greater or equal to the median score of the overall (nine) QoL domains or among women who had POP [29, 30].
Good quality of life
Less than the median score of the overall (nine) QoL domains or among women who had POP. [25].
Stages of prolapse
Based on the Baden–Walker Halfway Scoring System:
Stage 0: is no prolapse.
Stage I: is leading part of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the hymen.
Stage II: is the leading edge less than or equal to 1 cm above or below the hymen;
Stage III: is leading edge is more than 1 cm beyond the hymen, but less than or equal to the total vaginal length;
Stage IV: is complete version [13].
Premenopausal: is the time between your first period and the onset of menopause [32]
Menopause: is the time that marks the end of your menstrual cycle [32]
Menopause can happen in your 40s or 50s, but the average age is 51 in the United States [32].
Decubitus ulcer: Damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time [33].
Data quality control
Training was given to data collectors and supervisors. Data collectors were supervised through-out the data collection period. Pretesting of the questionnaire was carried out on the 5% sample size atWolkite Health Center before the actual data collection period to assess the clarity, sequence, consistency, understandability, and time taken to complete the questionnaire. Then, the overall process was coordinated, and controlled by the investigators. Investigators, supervisors, and data collectors had a discussion meeting throughout data collection to ensure completeness. Furthermore, the collected data was Checked coded, and entered into Epi-Data version 4.6.
Data processing & analysis
The collected data was entered into the Epi data version 4.6 computer program. Then it was exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 26. Descriptive statistics like frequency and summary statistics were employed to describe the characteristics of the study participants. The multicollinearity of the predictor variable was checked by using the variance inflation factor before binary logistic regression was done, and it will be < 10>
Result
Among a total sample of study participants, 401 women were interviewed in the study, and gave a response rate of 97.1% response rate and the results were presented as follows under subheadings.
Socio-demographic characteristics
Half of the participants were 29 to 72 years with a mean and SD of 50.7 ± 9.05 years. Most of the respondents 352(87.8%) were married. Regarding educational status, 204(49.87%) were non-educated andthe majority of respondents were rural residents (77.8%) and (59.6%) were farmers. According to income level, most respondents were 3000-10,000 their income and access to transport for most respondents was rare (61.8%) (Table 1).
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics among women diagnosed with POP public hospitals of central Ethiopia 2024 (n=401).
Variables | Categories | Frequency(n=401) | Percentage (%) |
Age in years | 29-49 | 205 | 51.1 |
50-59 | 116 | 28.9 | |
>60 | 80 | 20 | |
The mean ±SD age of the respondents was 50.7±9.05 | |||
Religion | Orthodox | 212 | 52.9 |
Muslim | 148 | 36.9 | |
Protestant | 41 | 10.2 | |
Residency | Urban | 89 | 22.2 |
Rural | 312 | 77.8 | |
Marital status | Married | 352 | 87.8 |
Divorced | 25 | 6.2 | |
Widowed | 24 | 6.0 | |
Educational level | No formal education | 250 | 62.4 |
Primary school | 120 | 29.9 | |
Secondary school | 28 | 7 | |
Diploma and above | 3 | 0.7 | |
Occupational status | Farmer | 228 | 56.9 |
Housewife | 119 | 29.7 | |
Merchant | 24 | 6.0 | |
Government employee | 23 | 5.7 | |
Private employee | 7 | 1.7 | |
Income level | 3000-10000 | 372 | 92.8 |
10001-15000 | 18 | 4.5 | |
>15000 | 11 | 2.7 | |
Transport Access | Not at all | 5 | 1.2 |
Rarely | 248 | 61.8 | |
Constantly | 148 | 36.9 |
Gynecologic and obstetrics characteristics
Of the total study participants, 296(73.8%) prolapses were 1 and two-year durations and the rest 105(26.2%) were greater than two-year durations with a mean±SDscore of 2.08±1.14. Regarding stages of prolapse, 163(40.6%) of women had stage III prolapse, and 151(37.7%) were stage II respectively. Among the study subjects, 98(24.5%) of women had >seven number of childbirths with a mean±SDcore of 6.45 ± 1.54. In addition, most of the respondents 351(87.5%) had decubitus ulcer (Table 2).
Table 2: Gynecologic & obstetrics characteristics among women diagnosed with public hospitals of central Ethiopia 2024 (n=401).
Variables | Categories | Frequency(n=401) | Percentage (%) |
Parity | 3-7 | 302 | 75.5 |
>7 | 99 | 24.5 | |
Duration of prolapse | 1-2 years | 296 | 73.8 |
>2years | 105 | 26.2 | |
Menopausal status | Menopausal | 188 | 29.7 |
Premenopausal | 213 | 70.3 | |
Stages of prolapse | Stage I | 21 | 5.2 |
Stage II | 151 | 37.7 | |
Stage III | 163 | 40.6 | |
Stage IV | 66 | 16.5 | |
Decubitus ulcer | Yes | 351 | 87.5 |
No | 50 | 12.5 |
The magnitude of quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse
In this study, the magnitude of poor quality of life among women with pelvic organ prolapse was 194(48.4%) (95% CI 43, 53). (Figure 1). General Health Condition 331(82.7%), the impact of POP 295(73.6%), Emotion 219(54.6%) and personal relationship 215(53.6%) were domains of quality of life that had the highest score, whereas physical limitation127 (31.7%), Intensity or Severity of Pain 117(29.2%) and rolelimitation117 (28.2%) had the lowest score (Table 3).
Figure 1: Magnitude of quality of life among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse at public hospitals of central Ethiopia 2024 (n=401).
Table 3: Quality of life domain score among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse at public hospitals of central Ethiopia2024 (n=401).
Domains | Quality of life domain score | Percentage (%) |
The magnitude of quality-of-life domain score above the median score | ||
The overall quality of life | 194 | 48.4 |
General Health Condition | 331 | 82.5 |
POP on the overall life | 295 | 73.6 |
Role limitation | 113 | 28.2 |
Physical Limitation | 127 | 31.7 |
Social Limitation | 162 | 40.4 |
Personal Relationship | 215 | 53.6 |
Emotion | 219 | 54.6 |
Sleep/ Energy | 143 | 35.7 |
Intensity or Severity of Pain | 117 | 29.2 |
Factor associated with quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse
Binary logistic regression analysis was done to identify candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression at a p-value of less than 0.25. The variables from socio-demographics (age of mothers with POP, Marital status, Menopausal status), from quality-of-life POP-related factors (duration of prolapse, parity, menstrual status, stages of prolapse, presence of decubitus ulcer) were taken to multivariable logistic regression. In multivariable logistic regression, the presence of a decubitus ulcer, parity, and stages of prolapse were revealed statistically significantly associated with the quality of life of women with POP when adjusted in the final model. Then the variables were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis. The final model included only three variables. Model fitness was assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness of Fit test, which yielded a p-value of 0.201. Furthermore, all independent variables had no Multicollinearity, with a variance inflation factor (VIF) less than 10. The findings showed that women with stage III/IV prolapse were 14.5 times more likely to have a poor quality of life than those with stage I or II prolapse (AOR=14.5, 95% CI 8.05, 26.08). In addition, women who had parity greater than seven were 3.1 more likely to have a poor quality of life than women who had parity 3-7 (AOR = 3.1 95% CI 1.59, 6.01). Furthermore, women who had a decubitus ulcer were 4.1 times more likely to have a poor quality of life than their counterparts (AOR = 4.1 95% CI 1.38, 12.15) (Table 4).
Table 4: Factor associated with Quality of life among women diagnosed with POP atpublic hospitals of central Ethiopia 2024 (n=401).
Variables | Categories | Level of Quality of life (%) | ||||
Poor | Good | COR (95%CI) | AOR (95%CI) | P-value | ||
Menopausal status | Premenopause | 87(40.8) | 126(59.2) | 1 | 1 | |
Menopause | 107(56.9) | 81(43.1) | 1.9(1.286,2.847) | 0.585(0.098,3.491) | 0.556 | |
Stages of prolapse | Stage I/II | 23(13.4) | 149(77) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Stage III/IV | 171(74.7) | 58(25.3) | 19.1(11.236,32.467) | 14.5(8.058,26.084) * | 0.0001 | |
Menstrual status | Yes | 37(31.5) | 82(68.9) | 1 | 1 | |
No | 157(55.7) | 125(44.3) | 2.78(1.768,4.382) | 1.45(0.702,2.995) | 0.316 | |
Parity | 3-7 | 117(38.7) | 185(61.3) | 1 | 1 | |
>7 | 77(87.9) | 22(22.2) | 5.534(3.266,9.377) | 3.1(1.596,6.012) * | 0.001 | |
Duration of prolapse | 1-2 years | 123(41.6) | 173(58.4) | 1 | 1 | |
>2 years | 71(67.6) | 34(32.4) | 2.937(1.836,4.697) | 0.932(0.495,1.753) | 0.827 | |
Age | 24-49 years | 84(41) | 121(49) | 1 | 1 | |
50-59 years | 54(46.6) | 62(53.4) | 1.25(0.793,1.987) | 0.87(0.145,5.179) | 0.875 | |
less than 60 years | 56(70) | 24(30) | 3.36(1.933,5.845) | 0.9(0.125,6.239) | 0.901 | |
Decubitus ulcer | Yes | 45(90) | 5(10) | 12.2(4.729,31.482) | 4.1(1.383,12.157) * | 0.01 |
No | 149(42.5) | 202(57.5) | 1 | 1 | ||
Marital status | Married | 166(47.1) | 186(52.9) | 1 | 1 | |
Divorced | 12(48) | 13(52) | 1.03(0.459,2.330) | 1.1(0.358,3.227) | 0.898 | |
Widowed | 16(66.6) | 8(33.3) | 2.24(0.935,5.371) | 1.28(0.421,3.891) | 0.663 |
COR=Crude odds ratio, AOR=Adjusted odds ratio, *= statistically significant at p-value less than 0.05
Discussion
According to this study, the overall poor quality of life among women with pelvic organ prolapse was 48.4% (95% CI 43, 53). This revealed that, while pelvic organ prolapse is a benign condition, it has a significant impact on women's quality of life. This finding is in line with a study conducted in, Uganda 45.5% [34], and Slovakia 52.8% [12]. This is because, while the quality of life of women with POP differs by nation based on economic level, lifestyle, educational level, and culture, prolapsed pelvic organ symptoms are the most common risk factors for poor Quality of life [13, 49]. On the other hand, it is higher than research conducted in Ghana, which found 39.4% [36]. This discrepancy is caused by differences in the Quality-of-life domain or item scores, as well as sample size. It is also lower than a study conducted in France (54.5%) [37]and Ethiopia's SNNPR region (57.5%) [25]. Furthermore, this study found that women with POP had a poor quality of life when they were in the stage of prolapse, parity, and the presence of a decubitus ulcer. This conclusion is supported by research conducted in South Africa [29], Taiwan [36], Thailand [33], Nepal [38], the USA [39], Italy [40], and London [30]. This is because as the stages of the prolapse advanced, secondary effects such as decubitus ulcers, bowel symptoms, urinary symptoms, abdominal symptoms, and sensations in the vagina increased which worsened the quality of life [30, 41,38].
Women who had a decubitus ulcer are 4.1 times more likely associated with poor quality of life of women with POP, but it has not been studied as extensively in previous literature. The evidence showed that decubitus ulcers become increasingly prevalent as the POP-Q stage progresses. As POP-Q progresses, the ulcer grows in size. Therefore, if we discover a decubitus ulcer when examining a prolapsed patient, we must first treat it. It should be addressed effectively before surgical treatment is done for better postoperative outcomes and fewer issues during the operative correction of pelvic organ prolapse [33]. Moreover, this study showed that women’s being parous greater than seven were 3.1 times more likely associated with poor quality of life. This finding is supported by studies conducted in Pakistan [42], France [13], and Bangladesh [43]. This is because, as the parity of women increased, there was the presence of prolapse and progressive disability. Being in a high parity could be considered a risk factor for POP and increase the burden and responsibilities for women's lives. In addition, as the parity of women increased, there was an increased risk of prolapse that caused advanced stages of prolapse, and then that caused a symptomatic prolapse that worsened women’s health conditions [44]. Women having advanced stage III/IV POP were 14.5 times more likely associated with poor quality of life. This finding is supported by studies done in Thailand [33], Nepal [38], and Ghana [36]. POP symptoms increase with the advanced stage and reduce the quality of life [44].
Limitations of the study
This research topic was sensitive and it is affected by social desirability bias so it might affect the results. Moreover, since the study design is a cross-section, it does not show cause and effect.
Conclusion
According to this study, around half of women with pelvic organ prolapse had a poor quality of life. Stage III/IV prolapse, presence of decubitus ulcer, and high parity, were significantly associated with poor quality of life. To effectively manage pelvic organ, prolapse and improve quality of life, a holistic, patient-centered approach tailored to individual needs can lead to better outcomes and overall well-being for women with pelvic organ prolapse. Assessing the quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse is critical for understanding its impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being.
Recommendation
To the Central Ethiopia region health bureau
- Providing early detection and treatment for women with POP, which has previously been overlooked in the community.
- Take a holistic approach to comprehensive assessment, functional impact, psychological well-being, social support, symptom management, and a multidisciplinary approach.
To healthcare facility
- Take a holistic approach to care by considering the impact of POP on various aspects of a woman's life and informing the development of targeted interventions, treatments, and support services that address the unique needs and challenges.
- Ensure the women with POP receive comprehensive assessment and support that addresses their unique needs and enhances their quality of life.
To researcher
- Researchers need on why women with pelvic organ prolapse are not early attending healthcare facilities.
- Further community and longitudinal interventional studies are needed.
Abbreviations
AOR--Adjusted Odds Ratio, COR—Crude Odds Ratio, GYN/OBS--gynecology & obstetrics, OPD-- Outpatient Department, POP--Pelvic Organ Prolapse, QoL-- Quality of Life, CE--Central Ethiopia, UVP--Utero Vaginal Prolapse, WUSTH-- Wolkite University Specialized Teaching Hospital
Declarations
Supplementary Information
The information will be accessed by official connection with the Correspondence author.
Acknowledgments
First, I would like to thank Wolkite University, the College of Medicine and Health Science for giving me the chance to do this research. We also want to thank the study participants, data collectors, supervisors, health institutions administrate, data clerks, and others who directly or indirectly contributed to this work for their kind cooperation and invaluable collaboration.
Authors’ contributions
MAM, MDT, MT, and ASA wrote the proposal, participated in data collection, analyzed the data, and drafted the paper. ABD, MT, and MAM approved the proposal with some revisions, participated in data analysis, and revised subsequent drafts of the paper. MDT and ASA commented on the final paper and manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
There is no potential conflict of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Patient consent for Publication
Not applicable
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from Wolkite University College of Medicine and Health Science. A formal letter was written from the university to the central Ethiopian health office. An official letter of permission was obtained from the Central Ethiopian Health Office. Participants of the study were briefed about the objectives and aims of the study in detail. Participants were informed that their participation was purely voluntary and assured of the confidentiality of all information. After all, informed, voluntary, written, and signed consent was obtained from study participants. Confidentiality of the data was assured throughout the study.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- Borsamo A, Oumer M, Worku A, Asmare Y. (2023). Associated factors of pelvic organ prolapse among patients at Public Hospitals of Southern Ethiopia: A case-control study design. PLoS One. 18(1):e0278461.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Barber MD. (2016). Pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ, 354:i3853.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Keshavarz H, Hillis S. (2002). Hysterectomy surveillance—United States, 1994-1999. MMWr cDc Surveill. 51:1994-1999.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ali A, Yadeta E, Eyeberu A, Abdisa L, Bekana M, Dheresa M. (2022). Pelvic organ prolapse and associated factors among women admitted to gynecology ward at the Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Harar, eastern Ethiopia. SAGE open Med, 10:20503121221126364.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Walker GJA, Gunasekera P. (2011). Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J, 22(2):127-135.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gedefaw G, Demis A. (2020). Burden of pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health, 20(1):1-9.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Beketie ED, Tafese WT, Assefa ZM, Berriea FW, Tilahun GA, Shiferaw BZ, et al. (2021). Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders and its associated factors in South-Central Ethiopia. PLoS One, 16(7):e0254050.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Badacho AS, Lelu MA, Gelan Z, Woltamo DD. (2022). Uterine prolapse and associated factors among reproductive-age women in southwest Ethiopia: A community-based crosssectional study. PLoS One, 17(1):1-10.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Weber AM, Richter HE. (2005). Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol, 106(3):615-634.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. (2015). Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 27(5):380-384.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Svihrova V, Svihra J, Luptak J, Swift S, Digesu GA. (2014). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in general population with pelvic organ prolapse: a study based on the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QOL). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 182:22-26.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. (2009). Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol, 113(3):609-616.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Davila GW. (2005). Concept of the pelvic floor as a unit: The case for multidisciplinary pelvic floor centers. Urin Fecal Incontinence An Interdiscip Approach, 457-465.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dietz V, Maher C. (2013). Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J, 24(11):1853-1857.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Segedi LM, Ilić KP, Curcić A, Visnjevac N. (2011). Quality of life in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Vojnosanit Pregl, 68(11):940-947.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gjerde JL, Rortveit G, Muleta M, Adefris M, Blystad A. (2017). Living with pelvic organ prolapse: voices of women from Amhara region, Ethiopia. Int Urogynecol J, 28(3):361-366.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Islam RM, Oldroyd J, Rana J, Romero L, Karim MN. (2019). Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J, 30(12):2001-2011.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gunasekera P, Sazaki J, Walker G. (2007). Pelvic organ prolapse: don’t forget developing countries. Lancet (London, England). England, 369:1789-1790.
Publisher | Google Scholor - AVCIBAY VURGEÇ B, KIZILKAYA BEJİ N. (2018). Quality of life and sexual life in women with advanced stage pelvic organ. Cukurova Med J, 43(Ek1):230-239.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Barber MD, Amundsen CL, Paraiso MFR, Weidner AC, Romero A, Walters MD. (2007). Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 18(7):799-806.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tefera Z, Temesgen B, Arega M, Getaneh T, Belay A. (2023). Quality of life and its associated factors among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region public referral hospitals, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health, 23(1):342.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rogers GR, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C. (2001). Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 12(6):361-365.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. (2010). An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J, 21(1):5-26.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tefera Z, Temesgen B, Arega M, Getaneh T, Belay A. (2023). Quality of life and its associated factors among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region public referral hospitals, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health, 23(1):1-8.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tok EC, Yasa O, Ertunc D, Savas A, Durukan H, Kanik A. (2010). The effect of pelvic organ prolapse on sexual function in a general cohort of women. J Sex Med, 7(12):3957-3962.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Carroll L, O’ Sullivan C, Doody C, Perrotta C, Fullen B. (2022). Pelvic organ prolapse: The lived experience. PLoS One, 17(11):e0276788.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ghetti C, Skoczylas LC, Oliphant SS, Nikolajski C, Lowder JL. (2015). The Emotional Burden of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Seeking Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 21(6):332-338.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Brandt C, Janse van Vuuren EC. (2019). Dysfunction, activity limitations, participation restriction and contextual factors in South African women with pelvic organ prolapse. South African J Physiother, 75(1):933.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. (2005). The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG, 112(7):971-976.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A. (2007). Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 135(1):132-135.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ceylan B, Özerdoğan N. (2015). Factors affecting age of onset of menopause and determination of quality of life in menopause. Turkish J Obstet Gynecol, 12(1):43-49.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Samantray SR, Mohapatra I. (2021). Study of the Relationship Between Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Staging and Decubitus Ulcer in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Cureus, 13(1):e12443.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Kayondo M, Kaye DK, Migisha R, Tugume R, Kato PK, Lugobe HM, et al. (2021). Impact of surgery on quality of life of Ugandan women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health, 21(1):1-7.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Davila GW. Concept of the Pelvic Floor as a Unit. 3-4.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. (2010). Validation of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire in Thai version. Int Urogynecol J, 21(8):985-993.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Chauvin C, Chéreau E, Ballester M, Daraï E. (2012). Potential relevance of pre-operative quality of life questionnaires to identify candidates for surgical treatment of genital prolapse: a pilot study. BMC Urol, 12:9.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Shrestha B, Onta S, Choulagai B, Paudel R, Petzold M, Krettek A. (2015). Uterine prolapse and its impact on quality of life in the Jhaukhel-Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Glob Health Action, 8:28771.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. (2006). Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194(5):1455-1461.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santillo V, Digesu A, Cormio G, et al. (2003). Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 106(2):184-192.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Wusu-Ansah OK, Opare-Addo HS. Pelvic organ prolapse in rural Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet, 103(2):121-124.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Jokhio AH, Rizvi RM, MacArthur C. (2020). Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: Population-based study. BMC Womens Health, 20(1):1-7.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Imoto A, Sarker M, Akter R, Matsuyama A, Honda S. (2021). Health-related quality of life in parous women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence in Bangladesh. Int Urogynecol J, 32(4):887-895.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Fontenele MQS, Moreira MA, de Moura ACR, de Figueiredo VB, Driusso P, Nascimento SL. (2021). Pelvic floor dysfunction distress is correlated with quality of life, but not with muscle function. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 303(1):143-149.
Publisher | Google Scholor