Research Article
Clinicopathological characteristics and Survival outcomes of Ovarian tumours in Women: A Retrospective study at Federal Medical Centre Abuja, Nigeria
- Juliet Oluchukwu Offor *
- Nana Aisha Gwary
- Olufumbi Olukemi Makinde
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Juliet Oluchukwu Offor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Citation: Offor J O, Gwary N A, Makinde O O. (2025). Clinicopathological characteristics and Survival outcomes of Ovarian tumours in Women: A Retrospective study at Federal Medical Centre Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Women Health Care and Gynecology, BioRes Scientia Publishers. 5(2):1-10. DOI: 10.59657/2993-0871.brs.25.077
Copyright: © 2025 Juliet Oluchukwu Offor, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: December 20, 2024 | Accepted: January 10, 2025 | Published: January 20, 2025
Abstract
Background: Ovarian tumours encompass a heterogenous group of neoplasms, ranging from benign physiological cysts to malignant pathologies. Ovarian cancer ranks among the leading gynaecological cancer-related deaths worldwide. Understanding the incidence, clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates of ovarian tumours in our facility is crucial for developing effective management strategies and improving patient outcomes.
Aim: This study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival rates of women with ovarian tumours at Federal Medical Centre Abuja.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Federal Medical Centre Abuja from 31st August 2019 to 30th August 2024. Data were extracted from the gynaecological ward, theatre and histopathology department’s records. Data analysis was performed using Epi infoTM 7.2.6.0 (2023 version). Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate regression.
Results: Out of 9,963 gynaecological cases managed, 165 were ovarian tumours. Among these, 131 (79.4%) had histological diagnoses, comprising 85 (64.9%) benign and 46 (35.1%) malignant tumours. The average incidence rate was 26.2 per year. The mean age was 37.8 ± 13.18 years, with majority (51.4%) aged between 20-39 years and 54.2% were of low parity (0 -1). Majority presented with abdominal pain (85.5%) and abdominal mass or swelling (65.6%). Epithelial type (43.5%) was the most common histologic type and mainly of serous subtype (31.0%). The overall survival rate was 91.6%, with a 100% survival for benign and 76.1% for malignant cases. Cox regression analysis revealed that age, FIGO stage, and surgery outcome were significant predictors of survival, with hazard ratios of 4.21, 9.21 and 7.39 respectively.
Conclusions: Our study revealed a higher prevalence of benign ovarian tumours among women at FMC Abuja, with malignant tumours accounting for significant case fatality. Advanced age (≥60 years), higher FIGO stages (III-IV) and suboptimal surgical outcome were associated with poorer survival outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of early detection and tailored treatment strategies, including comprehensive surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy, to improve survival rates among ovarian cancer patients.
Keywords: ovarian tumours; ovarian cancer; clinicopathological characteristics; predictors; survival rates
Introduction
Women may develop ovarian tumours at various points in their lives due to the demands of their reproductive cycle. The ovaries, paired oval-shaped reproductive organs located in the true pelvis, play a crucial role in hormone production necessary for human reproduction [1]. Structurally, they comprise the germinal epithelium, a collagen connective tissue known as the tunica albuginea, the cortex containing ovarian follicles, and the central medulla filled with loose connective tissue and major blood vessels [2]. Tumours can arise from any of these layers and may be classified as benign, borderline, or malignant [3]. Functional cysts represent about 24 Percentage of ovarian cysts, benign tumours account for 70 Percentage, and malignant tumours for approximately 6% [4]. Benign tumours are more common in younger women, while malignant counterparts are predominant in older women [5]. Benign ovarian tumours are categorized based on cell origin, with epithelial tumours (serous, mucinous, endometroid, clear cell and Brenner tumours) constituting 60-80% of true ovarian neoplasms, germ cell tumours (mature teratomas and dermoid) accounting for 40-50 Percentage and sex cord-stromal tumours (thecoma, fibroma and Hilus cell tumour) accounting for 5-10% [6]. Ovarian cancers are responsible for 3-5 Percentage of cancers in women, ranking as the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Epithelial type accounts for 90 Percentage of malignant ovarian tumours [8, 9].
The underlying mechanisms often involve incessant ovulation, leading to somatic gene mutations [6]. Risk factors include nulliparity, use of ovulation induction agents, lifestyle factors, genetics, and diet [7]. Clinically, symptoms can be non-specific, including abdominal pain, swelling, and distension, with some patients remaining asymptomatic (23% of cases) (10). Treatment modalities typically involve surgical intervention and chemotherapy, with prognosis improving significantly with early diagnosis [7-10]. Most studies on ovarian tumours have predominantly focused on Caucasian, Indian, and Middle Eastern women, with limited research on African populations [11]. This study aims to determine the prevalence, commonest histological types, risk factors, clinical features, and survival rates of women with ovarian tumours at the Federal Medical Centre, Abuja.
Materials and Methods
Study designs and setting
This was a five-year retrospective cross-sectional study of all the ovarian tumours managed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Federal Medical Centre Abuja (FMC Abuja) from 31st August 2019 to 30th August 2024. FMC Abuja is one of the main referral tertiary hospitals that employ multidisciplinary committee approach in patient’s management in Abuja.
Study Population
The study population consisted of all ovarian tumours managed during the study period with histological diagnosis. Cases with incomplete information, lacking tissue diagnoses and cases managed outside the study period were excluded from the study.
Method of Data Collection/Analysis
Data were extracted from the theatre, gynaecological ward, and histopathology departmental records. The data extracted included: age, marital status, parity, level of education, menopausal status, presenting complaint, diagnosis, type of surgery, histology, treatment received, status of the patient (alive/dead). The data were entered and analyzed using Epi InfoTM 7.2.6.0 (2023 version) [12]. The data results were presented as means and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate regression. The survival outcome was censored at 5 years of follow up.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical approval was obtained from the Federal Medical Centre Abuja Health Research and Ethics Committee.
Results
Out of the 9,963 gynaecological cases managed within the 5-year study period, 165 were ovarian tumours. Among these, 131 (79.4%) had histological diagnoses, comprising 85 (64.9%) benign and 46 (35.1%) malignant tumours. The average incidence rate for ovarian tumours was 26.2 per year. Benign and malignant ovarian tumours have incidences of 17.0 per year and 9.2 per year respectively.
Socio-demographic characteristics
The mean age of the study population was 37.8±13.1836 years, ranging from 11-83 years, with most cases (51.4%) occurring in women aged 20-39. Benign tumour occurred mostly in women aged 20-39 years while their malignant counterpart in age 40-59 years. The majority (54.2%) were of low parity (0-1), with statistical analysis revealing a correlation between low parity and increased risk of ovarian tumours (p=0.001). Most women had tertiary education (72.5%), were married (62.6%), of Igbo ethnicity (35.1%), were self-employed (45.8%), had no family history of cancers (80.9%), were premenopausal (81.7%) and non-smoker. These are presented in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristic of the study population
Variables | Study n=131(%) | Benign n=85(%) | Malignant n=46 (%) | X2 | df | P |
Age-group (years) | 43.33 | 3 | less than 0.01 | |||
0-19 | 6 (4.6) | 4 (4.7) | 2 (4.3) | |||
20-39 | 74 (56.5) | 65 (76.5) | 9 (19.6) | |||
40-59 | 40 (30.5) | 14 (16.5) | 26 (56.5) | |||
60 and above | 11 (8.4) | 2 (2.3) | 9 (19.6) | |||
Parity | 13.73 | 2 | 0.001 | |||
0-1 | 71 (54.2) | 48 (56.5) | 23 (50.0) | |||
2-5 | 53 (40.5) | 37 (43.5) | 16 (34.8) | |||
6 -10 | 7 (5.3) | 0.0 (0.0) | 7 (5.3) | |||
Education level | 12.42 | 3 | 0.006 | |||
No formal | 6 (4.6) | 1 (1.2) | 5 (10.9) | |||
Primary | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.3) | |||
Secondary | 28 (21.4) | 16 (18.8) | 12 (26.1) | |||
Tertiary | 95 (72.5) | 68 (80.0) | 27 (58.7) | |||
Occupation | 11.18 | 2 | 0.011 | |||
Public servant | 55 (42.0) | 43(50.6) | 12(26.1) | |||
Student | 16 (12.2) | 12 (14.1) | 4 (8.7) | |||
Self employed | 60 (45.8) | 30 (35.3) | 30 (65.2) | |||
Marital status | 7.73 | 2 | 0.021 | |||
Single | 40 (30.5) | 27 (31.8) | 13 (28.3) | |||
Married | 82 (62.6) | 56 (65.9) | 26 (56.5) | |||
Was married | 9 (6.9) | 2 (2.3) | 7 (15.2) | |||
Ethnic group | 3.777 | 3 | 0.29 | |||
Hausa/fulani | 24 (18.3) | 12 (14.1) | 12 (26.1) | |||
Igbo | 46 (35.1) | 33 (38.8) | 13 (28.3) | |||
Yoruba | 21 (16.0) | 15 (17.6) | 6 (13.0) | |||
Others (Efik, Kanuri, Tiv, Edo) | 40 (30.5) | 25 (29.4) | 15 (32.6) | |||
Family history of cancer | 0.011 | 1 | 0.92 | |||
Yes | 25 (19.1) | 16 (18.8) | 9 (19.6) | |||
No | 106 (80.9) | 69 (81.2) | 37 (80.4) | |||
Menopausal state | 27.45 | 1 | 0.000 | |||
Premenopause | 107 (81.7) | 81 (95.3) | 26 (56.5) | |||
Post menopause | 24 (18.3) | 4 (4.7) | 20 (43.5) |
Median age- 35 years, mean age- 37.8 ± 13.1836, median parity-1, mean partiy-1.8 ± 2.099
Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment modalities of the study
Table 2 shows the clinical assessment, histological findings and treatment modalities of the study population. The most common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (85.5%) and abdominal mass or swelling (65.6%). Histological analysis revealed that epithelial tumours accounted for 43.5%, with serous cystadenocarcinoma as the most common malignant subtype (15.3%). Majority of the benign tumours were of germ cell origin (41.2%,) with Dermoid cyst (41.2%) as the most common benign subtype. All the cases underwent surgery with cystectomy (58.8%) being the most common procedure for benign tumours. Optimal debulking surgery (47.8%) was performed in majority of cases and followed by suboptimal debulking (32.6%) in those with malignant tumours. The malignant tumours had stage I (15, 32.6%), stage II (8, 17.4%, Stage III (14, 30.4%) and stage IV (9, 19.6%), with cumulative advanced stage disease of 50.0%. Currently, 12 (26.1%) were disease free, 21 (45.6%) undergoing treatment, 2 (4.3%) had recurrent disease on treatment and 11 (23.9%) were deceased. Majority of the death found in this study occurred with advanced stage III-IV disease 10 (90.9%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 27.6% of women with malignant tumour.
Table 2: Clinicopathological features and treatment modalities of the study population
Characteristics | Study n=131 (%) | Benign n=85 (%) | Malignant n=46 (%) |
Clinical Symptoms | |||
- Abdominal pain | 116 (85.5) | 74 (87.1) | 42 (91.3) |
-Abdominal swelling/mass | 86 (65.6) | 40 (47.1) | 46 (100.0) |
- bloating | 12 (9.2) | 2 (2.3) | 10 (21.7) |
- irregular menstrual cycle | 23 (17.6) | 20 (23.5) | 3 (6.5 ()) |
- weight loss | 20 (15.3) | 2 (2.3) | 18 (39.1) |
- easy satiety | 20 (15.3) | 2 (2.3) | 18 ()39.1 |
- constipation | 19 (14.5) | 4 (4.7) | 15 (32.6) |
Histological type | |||
Epithelial | 57 (43.5) | 25 (29.4) | 32 (69.6) |
Germ cell tumour | 48 (36.6) | 35 (41.2) | 13 (28.3) |
Sex cord stromal tumour | 2 (1.5) | 1 (1.2) | 1 (2.2) |
Functional cyst | 24 (18.3) | 24 (28.2) | 0 (0.0) |
Histological subtypes | |||
-Serous cystadenocarcinoma | 20 (15.3) | - | 20 (43.5) |
Serous cystadenoma | 11 (8.4) | 11 (12.9) | - |
mucinous carcinoma | 6 (4.6) | - | 6 (13.0) |
Mucinous cystadenoma | 3 (2.3) | 3 (3.5) | - |
Endometroid carcinoma | 1 (0.8) | - | 1 (2.2) |
Endometroid cystadenoma | 4 (3.1) | 4 (4.7) | - |
Endometrioma | 7 (5.3) | 7 (8.2) | - |
Brenner | 1 (0.8) | - | 1 (2.2) |
Adenocarcinoma | 4 (3.1) | - | 4 (8.7) |
Dermoid | 35 (26.7) | 35 (41.2) | - |
Dysgerminoma | 5 (3.8) | - | 5 (10.9) |
Immature teratoma | 2 (1.5) | - | 2 (4.4) |
Mixed (yolk sac/embryonal) | 7 (5.3) | - | 7 (15.2) |
Fibroma | 1 (0.8) | 1 (1.2) | - |
Granulosa cell | 1 (0.8) | - | 1 (2.2) |
Corpus luteum | 24 (18.3) | 24 (28.2) | - |
Treatment modalities Surgery | |||
-cystectomy | 77 (58.8) | 73 (85.9) | 4 (8.7) |
-salpingo-ovariectomy | 3 (2.3) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (2.2) |
- ovariectomy | 7 (5.3) | 6 (7.1) | 1 (2.2) |
-TAH+ BSO | 3 (2.3) | 3 (3.5) | - |
-complete debulking | 4 (3.1) | 1 (1.2) | 3 (6.5) |
-optimal debulking | 22 (16.8) | - | 22 (47.8) |
-suboptimal debulking | 15 (11.4) | - | 15 (32.6) |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 35 (26.7) | - | 35 (76.1) |
Regression analysis of risk factors in women with ovarian tumours
A binary logistic regression analyses was performed to model the relationship between the predictor variables and the outcome variables (Benign vs malignant ovarian tumours). Age group 60-83 years was significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant tumours (odd ration OR=7.50, p=0.029). Also, postmenopausal status was significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant tumours (OR=4.50, p=0.010), while germ cell tumours had a significantly low risk of being malignant (OR=0.14, p less than 0.001). High parity has no significant association of being malignant (OR=2.3, p=0.322), as shown in Table 3 below:
Table 3: Regression analysis of the Risk factors (predictor)
Predictor Variables | Odd ratio | 95% confidence interval | P |
Age-group (ref: 0-19) | |||
0-39 | 0.23 | 0.05-1.13 | 0.071 |
40-59 | 3.13 | 0.73-13.43 | 0.124 |
60-83 | 7.50 | 1.23-45.83 | 0.029 |
Parity (ref: 0-1) | |||
2-5 | 0.73. | 0.38-1.40 | 0.344 |
6-10 | 2.33 | 0.43-12.67 | 0.322 |
Menopausal status | |||
Premenopausal (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Postmenopausal | 4.50 | 1.43-14.15 | 0.010 |
Histology type | |||
Epithelial cell (ref) | 1.00 | ||
Germ cell | 0.14 | 0.06-0.33 | less than 0.001 |
Sex cord stromal | 0.50 | 0.05-5.33 | 0.573 |
Functional cyst | - | - | - |
Clinical Outcome of the study population
The overall survival rate for the study population was 91.6%. This included a 100% survival rate for the 85 patients with benign tumours and a 76.1% survival rate for the 35 patients with malignant tumors. A Kaplan-Meier survival function analysis was conducted to compare the survival rates between the benign and malignant groups. The results are presented in Table 3. For the benign group, there were no reported deaths, resulting in a probability of survival of 1 for all patients. In contrast, the malignant group experienced instances of death, with failure times ranging from 12 to 60 months. The risk of death decreased over time, with only two reported deaths. The survival function for the malignant group indicates the probability of surviving past each time point. As expected, the shortest survival time (12 months) had the highest probability of survival (approximately 96.6%), while the longest survival time (60 months) had a lower probability of survival (approximately 90.1%). These findings are further illustrated in Figure 1, which shows that the probability of survival decreases as the survival time increases.
Table 4: Survival Function
Tumour Type | Time (month) | At Risk | Fail | Net Lost | survivor function | STD. Err | 95%CI [Lower] | 95%CI [Upper] |
Benign | 12 | 72 | 0 | 8 | 1.00000 | NA | NA | NA |
Benign | 24 | 64 | 0 | 15 | 1.00000 | NA | NA | NA |
Benign | 36 | 49 | 0 | 20 | 1.00000 | NA | NA | NA |
Benign | 48 | 29 | 0 | 17 | 1.00000 | NA | NA | NA |
Benign | 60 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1.00000 | NA | NA | NA |
Malignant | 12 | 29 | 1 | 13 | 0.96552 | 0.03388 | 0.77947 | 0.99507 |
Malignant | 24 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 0.90115 | 0.06976 | 0.63941 | 0.97607 |
Malignant | 36 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0.90115 | 0.06976 | 0.63941 | 0.97607 |
Malignant | 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.90115 | 0.06976 | 0.63941 | 0.97607 |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier survival curve
The cumulative hazard plot in Figure 2 visually examined the assumptions of a distributional model for reliability data. The graph has a decreasing cumulative hazard which indicates a lessening risk of an event with stability at greater than 3 units of natural log time.
Cumulative Hazard Plot
Figure 2: Cumulative Hazard of the study population
Risk factors that predict the outcomes of malignant ovarian tumours
The study examined the risk factors that predict outcomes in women with malignant ovarian tumours. The results are presented in Table 5. The following variables were found to be statistically significant predictors of survival: Age group (p=0.039), with women aged 60-83 years having a higher risk of death compared to those aged 11-19 years; FIGO stage (p=0.003) with stage IV cancer cases having a higher risk of death compared to stage I cancer, and Surgery outcome (p=0.006) with those who underwent suboptimal debulking surgery having a higher risk of death compared to those who underwent complete resection. Conversely, parity (p=0.891), family history (p=0.93), ethnicity (p=0.672), menopausal status (0.923) and histologic type (p=0.103) were not statistically significant predictors of survival in ovarian cancer patients.
Table 5: Predictor variables and outcomes for ovarian malignant tumours
Variable | Alive | Dead | Total | P-value |
Age group | 0.039 | |||
11-19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
20-39 | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
40-59 | 19 | 7 | 26 | |
60-83 | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
Parity group | 0.891 | |||
0-1 | 18 | 5 | 23 | |
2-5 | 12 | 4 | 16 | |
6-10 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
FIGO stage | 0.003 | |||
I | 14 | 1 | 15 | |
II | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
III | 10 | 4 | 14 | |
IV | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Histology | 0.103 | |||
epithelial | 23 | 9 | 22 | |
Germ cell | 11 | 2 | 13 | |
Sex cord stromal | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Family history | 0.923 | |||
yes | 8 | 1 | 9 | |
no | 27 | 10 | 37 | |
Ethnicity | 0.672 | |||
Hausa | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
Igbo | 12 | 1 | 13 | |
Yoruba | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Others | 11 | 4 | 15 | |
Menopausal status | 0.923 | |||
Premenopause | 21 | 5 | 26 | |
postmenopause | 14 | 6 | 20 | |
Surgery outcome | 0.006 | |||
Complete resection | 8 | 1 | 9 | |
Optimal debulking | 20 | 2 | 22 | |
Suboptimal debulking | 7 | 8 | 15 |
FIGO- International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Cox multivariate regression Analysis for malignant ovarian tumours
The Cox regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables (risk factors) and the hazard risk. The results of the Cox regression analysis were as shown in Table 6 below. Age group was shown to be a significant predictor of survival, with patients aged 60-83 years having a 4.21 times higher hazard rate (p=0.021) compared to those aged 11-19 years. FIGO Stage is also a significant predictor of survival, with patients at stage IV cancer having a 9.21 times higher hazard rate (p- less than 0.001) compared to those with stage I cancer. Histology showed that those with germ cell tumour had a 0.39 times lower hazard rate (p=0.073) compared to those with epithelial tumour. Surgery outcome is a significant predictor of survival, with patients who had sub-optimal debulking surgery having a 7.39 times higher hazard rate (p less than 0.001) compared to those with complete resection.
Table 6: Cox Regression Analysis
Variable | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
Age group (ref 11-19) | |||
20-39 | 1.54 | (0.43-5.53) | 0.512 |
40-59 | 2.83 | (0.93-8.63) | 0.066 |
60-83 | 4.21 | (123-14.41) | 0.021 |
Parity group (ref 0-1) | |||
2-5 | 0.93 | (0.36-2.41) | 0.876 |
6-10 | 1.53 | (0.51-4.49) | 0.446 |
FIGO Stage (ref I) | |||
II | 0.00 | (0.00-0.00) | 0.988 |
III | 3.42 | (1.13-10.35) | 0.029 |
IV | 9.21 | (3.13-27.07) | less than 0.001 |
Histology (ref epithelial) | |||
Germ cell | 0.39 | (0.14-1.09) | 0.073 |
Sex-cord stromal | - | - | - |
Family history (ref No) | |||
Yes | 0.55 | (0.18-1.39) | 0.294 |
Ethnicity (ref Hausa) | |||
Igbo | 0.33 | (0.08-1.39) | 0.128 |
Yoruba | 0.83 | (0.23-3.01) | 0.783 |
Others | 1.03 | (0.38-2.79) | 0.951 |
Menopausal status (ref premenopause) | |||
Postmenopause | 1.71 | (0.83-3.53) | 0.147 |
Surgery outcome (ref complete resection) | |||
Optimal debulking | 2.33 | (0.73-7.46) | 0.156 |
Suboptimal debulking | 7.39 | (2.53-21.59) | less than 0.001 |
Discussion
Our study aimed to determine the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of ovarian tumours among Nigerian women at the Federal Medical Centre Abuja over a five-year period. The overall histological findings revealed that benign lesions dominated the ovarian tumours, aligning with studies from other regions, although with varied frequencies. Our study's finding of 64.9 percentage benign tumours is consistent with the 69.2 percentage reported in Nnewi, South-East Nigeria [13], but lower than the 74.4 percentage reported in Uttarakhand, India, and 84.7 percentage reported in Benin, South-South Nigeria [14, 15]. Conversely, our study found malignant tumors in 36.1 percentage of cases, which is higher than the 22.2 percentage , 22.3 percentage , and 15.0 percentage reported in Nnewi, Uttarakhand, and Benin, respectively [13-15]. These findings emphasize the need for a consistent understanding of ovarian neoplasms across different populations. The demographic profile indicated that women aged 20-39 years represented the majority of cases (56.5%), coinciding with observations from studies conducted in other African countries, including Southern Ethiopia (48.1%) and Afghanistan (58.6%), where similar age distributions were noted [16, 17]. Benign tumours were predominantly found in women within this age group. In contrast, the prevalence of malignant tumours peaked in the 40-49 age group, where 56.5% of cases were identified. This shift towards an older demographic for malignant presentations underscores the impact of age as an essential risk factor in the development of ovarian cancers, corroborating findings from global literature [18, 19].
Low parity (0-1) was predominant in our study population (54.3%), consistent with existing research identifying nulliparity and low parity as significant risk factors for developing ovarian tumours [18, 19]. This aligns with the hypothesis that incessant ovulation, more frequently observed in nulliparous women, may contribute to tumourigenesis [18]. Similarly, we found that most patients (81.7%) were premenopausal, which has been documented as a critical time frame when many women present with complex ovarian masses [20]. Family history of tumours was present in 19.2 percentage of cases, which is significant given the known genetic predisposition linked to certain ovarian tumour types. Genetic factors, such as mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been associated with increased risks of ovarian and breast cancers, supporting the need for familial screening and counseling in at-risk populations [19]. The most common symptoms were abdominal pain and abdominal swelling/mass, mirroring reports from other studies [13-19]. These non-specific symptoms can lead to delays in diagnosis and management, especially in cases of malignant tumours, highlighting the need for heightened awareness and improvement in screening using pelvic examination and transvaginal ultrasound.
Histologically, our findings revealed that epithelial tumors (43.5%) and germ cell tumors (36.6%) accounted for the majority of cases, while functional cysts (18.3%) were also notable. The predominance of epithelial tumors aligns well with the literature, where they comprise approximately 90% of malignant ovarian tumors, with serous cystadenocarcinoma subtype dominating globally, as reported by many studies [8, 9]. Additionally, germ cell tumors being the second most common histological type is consistent with other studies, with mature cystic teratoma (dermoid cyst) as the most common benign ovarian tumour [21, 22]. However, only 1.5 percentage of tumours were identified as sex cord-stromal tumours, which is lower than that reported in some studies where these tumours often comprise 5-10 percentage [21] of ovarian neoplasms, suggesting unique epidemiological patterns in our population. Surgical intervention was primarily achieved through cystectomy in 58.8 percentage of cases, a common approach for managing benign ovarian masses, supporting findings from both regional and international studies that highlight this surgical option's role in benign and early-stage disease and preservation of ovarian function [23]. For malignant counterparts, optimal debulking surgery was achieved in most cases. However, the outcome data, with a survival rate of 76.1 percentage and a total of 11 deaths among the malignant cases, illustrates the severity and prognostic challenges associated with ovarian cancer.
Our study identified factors affecting survival, with age, cancer stage, and surgery outcome as significant predictors of survival. Consistent with other studies, our findings indicated that advanced age (60-83 years, p=0.021) is associated with poorer survival rates in ovarian cancer patients. A study by the American Cancer Society found that women diagnosed with ovarian cancer at age 65 or older had a 5-year survival rate of 33%, compared to 61 percentage in those under age 65 years [24]. Our study also found that the stage of cancer was a significant predictor of survival, with patients diagnosed at stage IV having the poorest survival rates (p less than 0.001). This is consistent with many studies, which found that advanced stage at diagnosis is a major predictor of poor survival in ovarian cancer patients compared with stage I [24, 25]. Furthermore, our study found that surgery outcome was a significant predictor of survival, with patients who underwent suboptimal surgery having poorer survival rates (p less than 0.001). This is consistent with studies, which showed that residual tumour >2cm is an important predictor of mortality within 1-year compared to complete resection surgery in ovarian cancer patients [26]. In contrast, our study found that parity, family history, ethnicity, menopausal status, and histologic types were not significant predictors of survival. This is consistent with some previous studies, which have found that these factors are not associated with survival in ovarian cancer patients [27]. This study's limitations include its retrospective design, single centre limiting generalization and relatively small sample size. However, the findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the clinicopathological profile and survival outcomes of ovarian tumors among Nigerian women.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study revealed a higher prevalence of benign ovarian tumours, predominantly epithelial type, among women at FMC Abuja, with malignant tumours (mostly serous cystadenocarcinoma) accounting for significant case fatalities. Advanced age (≥60 years), higher FIGO stages (III-IV) and suboptimal surgical outcome were associated with poorer survival outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of early detection and tailored treatment strategies, including comprehensive surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy, to improve survival rates among ovarian cancer patients.
Recommendations
Developing public awareness campaigns to educate the public, particularly women, about recognizing nonspecific symptoms of ovarian cancer and the importance of seeking medical attention early. Encouraging healthcare providers to consider ovarian tumour in differential diagnosis for women presenting with nonspecific symptoms, commence screening and early detection strategies. Standardizing treatment protocols and multidisciplinary care. Investigating the molecular mechanism underlying ovarian cancer development and progression, exploring innovative therapeutic strategies and developing predictive models for ovarian cancer risks and outcomes
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
The authors declare no sources of funding for the research.
Availability of the data
The authors will make the data available if needed.
Authors contribution
JOO wrote the research proposal and was major contributor to the manuscript writing.
NAG retrieved the data and contributed to the manuscript writing
OOM contributed to the manuscript writing
All authors read and approved the manuscript
Acknowledgement
The authors appreciate the assistance of gynaecological ward nurses, theatre staff, histopathology staff and medical records officers in data retrieval.The assistance of Meta AI artificial intelligence tools, in providing valuable insights and references during the research process is acknowledged.
References
- Sadler TW, Langman J. (2012). Langman's Medical Embryology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 243-245
Publisher | Google Scholor - Netter F. (2014). Atlas of Human Anatomy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, 341-393.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Li YY, Guo L, Li H, Li J, Dong F, Yi ZY, et al. (2019). NEK5 regulates cell cycle progression during mouse oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryonic development. Mol Reprod Dev, 86(9):1189-1198
Publisher | Google Scholor - Hoare BS, Khan YS. (2024). Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Female Internal Genitals. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Helm CW. (2012). Ovarian Cysts. Medscape.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Rofe G, Auslender R, Dirnfeld M. Benign ovarian cysts in reproductive-age women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3(7A):1-5.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Tzadik M, Purcell K, Wheeler JE. (2007). Benign Disorders of the Ovaries and Oviduct. In: Decherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N, editors. Current Diagnosis & Treatment, 654-660.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Brennan KM, Baker VV, Dorigo O. (2007). Premalignant & Malignant Disorders of the Ovaries & Oviducts. In: Decherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N, editors. Current Diagnosis & Treatment, 871-883.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Chacón E, Dasí J, Caballero C, Alcázar JL. (2019). Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm versus Risk Malignancy Index-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gynaecol Obstet Invest, 84(6):591-598.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gibson E, Mahdy H. (2024). Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Ovary. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Nair RV, Sughija G. Histopathological study of ovarian tumours in a tertiary care center. Obs Rev: J Obstet Gynaecol, 6:22-27.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Dean AG, Arner TG, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, et al. (2023). Epi InfoTM version 7.2.6.0, a database and statistics program for public health professionals.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ezejiofor IF, Ozor NS, Ogbu CC, Olaofe OO, Menkiti FE. (2021). Histopathological Profile of Primary Ovarian Lesions in Nnewi, Nigeria: A 5 Year Retrospective Study. Orient Journal of Medicine, 33(1-2):13-21.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Chandra K, Arora N. (2019). Clinicopathological analysis of ovarian tumours: a two-year retrospective study. IJRCOG, 8(8):1789-2320.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Forae GD, Aligbe JU. (2016). Ovarian tumours among Nigerian females: A private practice experience in Benin-City, Nigeria. Adv Biomed Res, 5:61.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Abena TA, Yerakly F, Korga T. (2023). Histopathologic patterns of ovarian tumours in Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. J Oncol, 14:2803201.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Ibrahimkhil AS, Malakzai HA, Haidary AM, Hussaini N, Abdul-Ghafar J. (2022). Pathological Features of Ovarian Tumours, Diagnosed at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Afghanistan: A Cross-sectional Study. Cancer Manag Res, 14:3325-3333.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Singla A. (2019). Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer. In: Preventive Oncology for the Gynaecologist. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 223-231.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Taheri S, Salshiniya H. (2019). Ovarian Cancer in the World: Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Int J Womens Health, 11:287-299.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Matalliotakis M, Matalliotakis C, Krithinakis K, Laliotis A, Kapetanios G, et al. (2023). Anatomic Distribution of Ovarian Tumours in Perimenopausal nd Postmenopausal Women. Careus, 15(1): e34059.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, et al. (2018). Ovarian Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin, 68(4):284-296.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Farag NH, Alsaggaf ZH, Bamardouf NO, Khesfaty DM, Fatani MM, et al. (2022). The Histopathological Pattern of Ovarian Neoplasms in Different Age Groups: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Centre. Cureus, 14(12): e33092.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Guillaume A, Pirrello O. (2018). Preservation of Fertility in Surgery of Benign and Borderline Malignant Ovarian Tumours. J Visceral Surg, 155(S1): S17-S21.
Publisher | Google Scholor - (2022). American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2022. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
Publisher | Google Scholor - National Cancer Institute. (2020). Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Stat Facts: Ovarian Cancer. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Orskov M, Lachina M, Guldberg R, Mogensen O, Norgard BM. (2016). Predictors of Mortality within 1 Year after Primary Ovarian Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study. BMJ Open, 6(4): e010123.
Publisher | Google Scholor - Gil-Ibáñez B, Oskay-Özcelik G, Richter R, Fotopoulou C, Braicu EI, et al. (2011). Predictive Factors in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer for Complete Tumour Resection. Anticancer Res, 31(8):2583-2587.
Publisher | Google Scholor